Hi!
Haven't been using Digikam in a few month and a few days ago I noticed that it has become so slow that it is almost unusable. There has been quite a few updates since it was fast so I have absolutely no idea what may have caused this.
When I clicking on an album folder, containing a few pictures, Digikam uses 3 or 4 of my 8 logical CPU's for several seconds during which time it is unresponsive. I have 8 GB of memory with a 35% usage.
Output of top -b|grep digikam:
I have tried migrating the database to MySQL but gained nothing in performance.
Has anyone else experienced this? Any hints?
TIA,
Gunnar
Haven't been using Digikam in a few month and a few days ago I noticed that it has become so slow that it is almost unusable. There has been quite a few updates since it was fast so I have absolutely no idea what may have caused this.
When I clicking on an album folder, containing a few pictures, Digikam uses 3 or 4 of my 8 logical CPU's for several seconds during which time it is unresponsive. I have 8 GB of memory with a 35% usage.
Output of top -b|grep digikam:
Code:
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m S 0.0 5.3 6:10.50 digikam
7482 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m R 10.6 5.3 6:10.82 digikam
7482 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m R 90.4 5.3 6:13.54 digikam
7482 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m R 83.5 5.3 6:16.05 digikam
7529 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 3.7 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
7482 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m R 90.7 5.3 6:18.78 digikam
7529 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m S 51.9 5.3 6:20.34 digikam
7529 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m S 0.0 5.3 6:20.34 digikam
7529 gugrim 20 0 540m 25m 16m S 0.0 0.3 0:00.11 kio_digikamalbu
6851 gugrim 20 0 3221m 424m 72m S 0.0 5.3 6:20.34 digikamHas anyone else experienced this? Any hints?
TIA,
Gunnar